Archivescreating

White Balance in Editing

One thing to keep in mind is that colour casts can often “throw us off”, making us feel like the whole WB is wrong, when in fact it’s patches of colour bouncing around and confusing us.

Be expecting colour casts! 

You will get colour casts any time light is bouncing off something coloured. Eg., green bouncing off the ground, yellows bouncing off flowers, blue bouncing off where there’s places exposed to the sky (eg., the tips of noses, between the ears and along the back). 

Rather than try and edit for colour casts, find a “reference point” and try and get that correct. On a black/white/grey dog that is usually somewhere around the eyes for me. Sometimes I will use the skin of the eyes or nose if they are black, even if the dog is coloured. 

Then, when you have the WB more or less correct, selectively edit the colour casts.

Eye-dropper tool

You’ll find some kind of automatic WB option in most editing programs. 

There are even some “presets” built in, though they don’t usually account for green forests or interesting light.

The “eye dropper tool” can be found at the top of the global adjustments panel in LR. 

To use it, you select the tool, then click somewhere in your image that should be pure black, white, or grey. Basically the tool adjusts the WB of the image to make that small area you clicked correct.

Therefore, it won’t work on pink/white, blue/grey, or rust/black, for example, and it won’t work anywhere with strong colour-casts. 

I usually use it between the eyes of a dog with a white stripe (like Loki), and never on Journey as his stripe is mottled with red.

You would also use this tool if you had a photo of a grey card.

Increase Saturation/Vibrance

This is a favourite trick of mine, and you can use any editing program to do it, but I will be showing it here with Lightroom.

It works best with grey/white/black dogs, but I do use it for coloured dogs, especially those with black noses and skin around their eyes.

Turn the vibrance and saturation all the way up to 100 and notice the colours in the dog’s coat. 

Now adjust the white balance sliders.

For grey/white/black dogs, I aim to get the colours in their coat to a point where no colour is dominating another one. Eg., there may be some areas of blue, some areas of yellow, some areas of purple… but there is not one single colour that is obvious everywhere.

Variations in colour is normal (colour casts, remember?). But when the entire dog is tinted blue, he’s probably too blue. 

Again, I usually use a “reference point” so I’m not looking at the whole dog, but instead choose a part of their face, maybe near their eyes, to hone in on. 

Be aware of fringing/chromatic aberration (you can search the site for more info on that!) which will show up with different lenses in areas of contrast. It will often be a shade of cyan green, or ultraviolet purple (though some lenses have pink or even blue). Don’t count this purple as “magenta” and use it for WB. 

 

Once you think it’s looking okay, turn the  vibrance & saturation back down to normal and double check. 

You may still need to tweak the values. This is ok. At least you’re off to a start.

In the case of golden hour, you may choose to deliberately make the dog’s coat slightly warmer than neutral. Due to the golden light in the scene, this would not feel unnatural or incorrect necessarily especially since we can normally SEE these golden tones with our naked eye.

I will argue, however, that blue is so subtle that it is only due to our camera’s sensitivity that it gets picked up. I’ve NEVER looked at my dogs in the shade and seen them look blue. So although it’s natural that the light in the shade is cooler than white daylight, I would not choose to deliberately make my dog cooler because of it. Unlike with golden hour. 

Of course there are RARE occasions where I’ve made the dog much much cooler (faking twilight/blue hour, when the light is visibly much more cool and does tend to affect the dog’s coat), but these are not the norm.

White Balance on Location

Grey Cards

Grey cards come in different shapes or sizes, but are essentially a grey target that you hold where the subject will be, and take a photo of. Do a quick google search and you’ll find plenty of examples.

You can then use the “Eye Dropper tool” in your editing program to set the WB based on this grey target.

I personally don’t use mine, either because I forget or I’m on my own, so unless I get Loki to hold it in his mouth, there’s not any way for me to use it.

Others have reported that the colours weren’t accurate after editing. I would guess this is because the grey card is bouncing colour off of it and Lightroom is overcompensating for this colour cast – much like if you used the dog’s chin or chest to automatically set the WB. 

Expodisc

I don’t have one and have never used one. It screws onto your camera lens and you take a photo as if you were the dog, looking toward where the photographer will be.

You then set the WB in camera. I’m planning on getting one and will let you know how it goes once I have it. 

In-Camera WB Presets

Your camera may also come with a number of “built in” WB settings, from fluorescent lights to overcast days to underwater.

All this does is it assigns a kelvin value to the image and doesn’t change it. Auto WB also assigns kelvin values but changes them depending on the location, light, colour etc that it detects. 

I have not found these presets to be particularly accurate for green forests, but could work well for overcast open skies – though I find this is when the auto WB is most accurate, since the light is white and neutral. 

White Balance Mania! Live Event

You guys uploaded 20+ images and I went about fixing the white balance on all of them, discussing what I’m looking for and at in order to set the right WB, tricks I use to help me, things to consider, and even what to do about colour casts.

Note that although I used Lightroom for this, you could easily use Adobe Camera Raw. I would not recommend using just Photoshop or working on a jpeg file. Why? Because all the subtleties of the RAW data has been lost, so instead of making small, subtle changes, you’re smashing your WB with a sledgehammer. 

Any questions? Ask below!